Within photography, there is a whole subject on morals and ethics that is dawned on us photographers whilst shooting, and also personally as individuals. To define morals, they are personal beliefs about what is right and wrong. Ethics on the other hand are standards expected of an individual or group.
List of 3 personal morals I hold:
Not to Judge.
I believe this is a really strong moral I hold because personally, I feel like if someone can open up about something, it will take lots of courage or they could be helpless. Whatever the reason may be, we shouldn't judge anyone because if the tables were turned - we wouldn't like if we were judged after opening up to someone. Also, we shouldn't judge things because we might get something completely wrong before knowing the truth. This could lead to more trouble and that false judgement might have impact on others through word of mouth. To give this moral an example, we could judge someone that a man is stealing from the supermarket who got caught, but we may figure out that he's homeless and he has to provide for his family. Personally, we don't understand the pain that he may be going through so it's not good to judge because we would have probably done the same regardless if it's right or wrong.
Tell the truth.
Sometimes, this may be a hard moral to hold but in some severe cases, it needs to be done. For example, if you driving and you managed to hit someone by accident, instead of covering it up, it would be best to tell the truth. This moral could save your life because if they did find out that you were the one to cause the accident, you could suffer from more consequences. Just by admitting that you caused it, it would show the guilt and sometimes it will help your inner self conscious because you won;t need to be hiding. But this moral does differ and it depends on the situation, you could be put in a dilemma where if you did tell the truth, it could harms someones life so it's a tough one. But usually, it's best to try tell the truth because it could possibly help the situation from falling back on you again.
Treat others how you want to be treated.
To put this moral in to consideration, an individual may have gone through a bad experience when they were young. If people were mistreated as children and went through child abuse, that individual can donate time and money to combat child abuse from their own experience and help out a charity for that cause. It doesn't necessarily have to be something you go through but it would just give you a good feeling that you've helped kids who are going through bad dilemmas so we would do what we can to help so they're treated like we'd want to be treated. It also means in generic that in public or anywhere, we should treat others with the same respect we'd expect back.
List of 3 photographic morals I hold:
Having consent from people.
I believe this is definitely a photographic moral I hold because referring back to my personal example, I'd expect the same in return. I don't think I would be happy having my photograph taken without permission so I see this moral the same way. When I go shooting, I always ask for permission and sometimes I also explain what I'm doing. Sometimes it may not be what we're after for example shooting candid, I think in this scenario, I'd take the image so it's not staged but then asking the person for consent if I could use it. If not I will delete the image. That way, we get both the candid shot and also permission to use the photograph.
Respecting privacy and consider publishing.
This ties in with the first moral, not only do we need their consent but I also think we need to consider their privacy and consider where it will be published. For example, we may get someones consent to do a nude shoot but that person might not want it published anywhere. We need to respect that and understand that those images need to be kept intact. On the other hand, if they accept that it can be published, we must not publish it again without asking for their permission. Most of this is common sense but we need to understand that some people may not be comfortable having their images viral so the least we could do is understand and ensure that we do it the right way.
Shooting sensitive images.
This moral relates to some scenarios where we may have to shoot sensitive images and it's just whether or not we do it. For example, let's say that a man has died in an accident whilst we was present in time. Would we shoot that dead body or is that morally wrong? Personally, I wouldn't photograph the dead body because I feel like it's tragic and I would sort of not expect it to happen to me when I die. That person that died could be someones mother or father or so forth so I just would have the respect to not photograph a stranger who died. However, this could change if I was working for a newspaper and that they required an image for the story. I think then I'd try an overcome it so it's not crossing the line but it's enough to get the job done.
List of 3 ethical standards expected of society:
Abortion.
Here is a subject that has many ethical views on. Abortion in some societies is seen as really bad because we're killing a life. Others say it's okay because it's not developed yet. Although our morals kick in whether it's right or wrong, many ethic values come in such as culture, religions and philosophic theories. For example, someone could be in a position where they may require an abortion because that baby is putting their life at risk, so there's an exception. However, others could see it as us playing God and killing a baby. It can be all complicated but that's one of the scenarios that has standards expected of society.
Visiting at a house.
On a lighter note, this is an example that is an ethical standard that is expected of society. When you are going to visit someone else's house, we would knock on the door or ring their doorbell to greet when at arrival. The standard from this is to respect the privacy and the existence of the host for what is right. We wouldn't just enter their property and be disrespectful towards them.
Media.
We have media all around us from the television, the internet, radio and newspaper and so on. These platforms are there where messages are carried out to an audience. Although they don't directly teach or influence ethics, there is a subconscious effect of communicating ethical values. For example, an article can carry messages about how our society feels about certain groups like Muslims. That would subconsciously give us these ethical values and people would behave a certain way towards them because of what they learn from the media.
List of 3 ethical standards within photography:
Not to manipulate for bad purposes.
With this moral, I don't think it's okay to manipulate an image to make it look bad. An example image of this that we've seen is the Sikh boy took a normal selfie with his iPad. This image was manipulated so he was holding the Quran with a bomb vest on. Whatever the person who manipulated it intentions were, I think this is something I would never do. It's actually offensive and mocks both religions and it also gives it a bad image. The fact that the image has been done is fair enough, but when it's published on the internet, it just changes the perspective and it's taken into extreme levels. One thing will just lead to another.
Distorting the scenery.
Like my moral that I listed, we may be in a scenario where we had to shoot the dead. Now in this case, we wouldn't actually distort anything or try and stage the scene. I think the ethic standards come in while we are shooting and we have to avoid distorting the true context, content and meaning of the photograph. If we did social documentary, it would be the case of not amending anything in the shot. If we did, it would be morally wrong and selfish just to make the shot look better. I believe it also could manipulate the meaning of the shot and it can be misleading to what you are suppose to document.
Doing justice with our photograph.
While doing photography, it's ethically right if we consider if we are photographing people and communities with the same respect I would show to neighbours and strangers in my home country, my religion or culture etc. It wouldn't be acceptable to shoot with bad intentions if we wouldn't like it happening to us. This ties in with consent and permission but it's more considering about if we're doing justice to what's around us. If it's not then maybe we need to consider what we're doing wrong and then amending it.
I think both morals and ethics are very similar subjects and they both tie in together. The way I see morals is more personal and how we feel about something. Ethics is what is expected of us and it's like rules & regulations of what is right and wrong. I've gone into depth of each ethic and morals, so I won't go rant on further. But I think it's interesting to see how each moral and ethics can differ depending on how serious the situation can be. Sometimes there is no right and wrong but we all have an idea of what is wise and what is not. With the context of photography, there is some serious factors we need to consider and others that aren't so serious. It's always best to consider a few things while shooting like the cause of it, and whether it has a good or bad impact, or are we instigating something further.
List of 3 personal morals I hold:
Not to Judge.
I believe this is a really strong moral I hold because personally, I feel like if someone can open up about something, it will take lots of courage or they could be helpless. Whatever the reason may be, we shouldn't judge anyone because if the tables were turned - we wouldn't like if we were judged after opening up to someone. Also, we shouldn't judge things because we might get something completely wrong before knowing the truth. This could lead to more trouble and that false judgement might have impact on others through word of mouth. To give this moral an example, we could judge someone that a man is stealing from the supermarket who got caught, but we may figure out that he's homeless and he has to provide for his family. Personally, we don't understand the pain that he may be going through so it's not good to judge because we would have probably done the same regardless if it's right or wrong.
Tell the truth.
Sometimes, this may be a hard moral to hold but in some severe cases, it needs to be done. For example, if you driving and you managed to hit someone by accident, instead of covering it up, it would be best to tell the truth. This moral could save your life because if they did find out that you were the one to cause the accident, you could suffer from more consequences. Just by admitting that you caused it, it would show the guilt and sometimes it will help your inner self conscious because you won;t need to be hiding. But this moral does differ and it depends on the situation, you could be put in a dilemma where if you did tell the truth, it could harms someones life so it's a tough one. But usually, it's best to try tell the truth because it could possibly help the situation from falling back on you again.
Treat others how you want to be treated.
To put this moral in to consideration, an individual may have gone through a bad experience when they were young. If people were mistreated as children and went through child abuse, that individual can donate time and money to combat child abuse from their own experience and help out a charity for that cause. It doesn't necessarily have to be something you go through but it would just give you a good feeling that you've helped kids who are going through bad dilemmas so we would do what we can to help so they're treated like we'd want to be treated. It also means in generic that in public or anywhere, we should treat others with the same respect we'd expect back.
List of 3 photographic morals I hold:
Having consent from people.
I believe this is definitely a photographic moral I hold because referring back to my personal example, I'd expect the same in return. I don't think I would be happy having my photograph taken without permission so I see this moral the same way. When I go shooting, I always ask for permission and sometimes I also explain what I'm doing. Sometimes it may not be what we're after for example shooting candid, I think in this scenario, I'd take the image so it's not staged but then asking the person for consent if I could use it. If not I will delete the image. That way, we get both the candid shot and also permission to use the photograph.
Respecting privacy and consider publishing.
This ties in with the first moral, not only do we need their consent but I also think we need to consider their privacy and consider where it will be published. For example, we may get someones consent to do a nude shoot but that person might not want it published anywhere. We need to respect that and understand that those images need to be kept intact. On the other hand, if they accept that it can be published, we must not publish it again without asking for their permission. Most of this is common sense but we need to understand that some people may not be comfortable having their images viral so the least we could do is understand and ensure that we do it the right way.
Shooting sensitive images.
This moral relates to some scenarios where we may have to shoot sensitive images and it's just whether or not we do it. For example, let's say that a man has died in an accident whilst we was present in time. Would we shoot that dead body or is that morally wrong? Personally, I wouldn't photograph the dead body because I feel like it's tragic and I would sort of not expect it to happen to me when I die. That person that died could be someones mother or father or so forth so I just would have the respect to not photograph a stranger who died. However, this could change if I was working for a newspaper and that they required an image for the story. I think then I'd try an overcome it so it's not crossing the line but it's enough to get the job done.
List of 3 ethical standards expected of society:
Abortion.
Here is a subject that has many ethical views on. Abortion in some societies is seen as really bad because we're killing a life. Others say it's okay because it's not developed yet. Although our morals kick in whether it's right or wrong, many ethic values come in such as culture, religions and philosophic theories. For example, someone could be in a position where they may require an abortion because that baby is putting their life at risk, so there's an exception. However, others could see it as us playing God and killing a baby. It can be all complicated but that's one of the scenarios that has standards expected of society.
Visiting at a house.
On a lighter note, this is an example that is an ethical standard that is expected of society. When you are going to visit someone else's house, we would knock on the door or ring their doorbell to greet when at arrival. The standard from this is to respect the privacy and the existence of the host for what is right. We wouldn't just enter their property and be disrespectful towards them.
Media.
We have media all around us from the television, the internet, radio and newspaper and so on. These platforms are there where messages are carried out to an audience. Although they don't directly teach or influence ethics, there is a subconscious effect of communicating ethical values. For example, an article can carry messages about how our society feels about certain groups like Muslims. That would subconsciously give us these ethical values and people would behave a certain way towards them because of what they learn from the media.
List of 3 ethical standards within photography:
Not to manipulate for bad purposes.
With this moral, I don't think it's okay to manipulate an image to make it look bad. An example image of this that we've seen is the Sikh boy took a normal selfie with his iPad. This image was manipulated so he was holding the Quran with a bomb vest on. Whatever the person who manipulated it intentions were, I think this is something I would never do. It's actually offensive and mocks both religions and it also gives it a bad image. The fact that the image has been done is fair enough, but when it's published on the internet, it just changes the perspective and it's taken into extreme levels. One thing will just lead to another.
Distorting the scenery.
Like my moral that I listed, we may be in a scenario where we had to shoot the dead. Now in this case, we wouldn't actually distort anything or try and stage the scene. I think the ethic standards come in while we are shooting and we have to avoid distorting the true context, content and meaning of the photograph. If we did social documentary, it would be the case of not amending anything in the shot. If we did, it would be morally wrong and selfish just to make the shot look better. I believe it also could manipulate the meaning of the shot and it can be misleading to what you are suppose to document.
Doing justice with our photograph.
While doing photography, it's ethically right if we consider if we are photographing people and communities with the same respect I would show to neighbours and strangers in my home country, my religion or culture etc. It wouldn't be acceptable to shoot with bad intentions if we wouldn't like it happening to us. This ties in with consent and permission but it's more considering about if we're doing justice to what's around us. If it's not then maybe we need to consider what we're doing wrong and then amending it.
I think both morals and ethics are very similar subjects and they both tie in together. The way I see morals is more personal and how we feel about something. Ethics is what is expected of us and it's like rules & regulations of what is right and wrong. I've gone into depth of each ethic and morals, so I won't go rant on further. But I think it's interesting to see how each moral and ethics can differ depending on how serious the situation can be. Sometimes there is no right and wrong but we all have an idea of what is wise and what is not. With the context of photography, there is some serious factors we need to consider and others that aren't so serious. It's always best to consider a few things while shooting like the cause of it, and whether it has a good or bad impact, or are we instigating something further.